Get in Touch With Us

This is the page to use if you want to reach the editorial team behind Best Offshore Casinos — to flag an error in a payout claim, question how a casino is ranked, suggest a site we should research, or ask something our reviews didn't answer. Email is the only channel we run, and a real person reads what arrives.

Write to us at [email protected]. Put the casino name in the subject line where one applies. We aim to reply within two business days, US Eastern time, and longer messages with specifics usually get a faster, more useful answer than short ones.

Before you email: what we can and can't do

We are an independent comparison publisher, not an operator, an agent, or a regulator. That shapes what a message to us can achieve.

What you want	Who handles it
Account locked, withdrawal pending, KYC documents rejected	The casino's own support team first — we cannot access, unlock or credit any account
A bonus wasn't applied or a rollover figure doesn't match what was advertised	The casino, then tell us — patterns across readers are exactly what we want to hear about
A figure on our site looks wrong or out of date	Us. Send the page and the detail; corrections are logged and dated
Whether offshore play is legal where you live	A qualified attorney in your state. We can explain the general picture, not your situation
Gambling is causing harm	Call or text 1-800-GAMBLER, free and confidential, 24/7

Commercial disclosure

Some links on this site are commercial, and the publisher may earn a commission when a reader signs up through them. That arrangement does not buy a position in our rankings, and it does not change what we write about an operator. If you think a review reads like it was bought, say so in an email — we would rather argue the point than have it assumed.

Questions about payout speed and reliability

Most reader mail we get concerns money leaving a casino rather than entering it, so it's worth setting out what we can address.

Offshore casinos advertise withdrawal windows; those are the operator's claims, not results we have measured. We publish them as advertised figures and say so. In general terms, crypto withdrawals — Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum, Litecoin and stablecoins such as USDT and USDC — are the fastest route offshore sites offer, often quoted in hours once a cashout is approved. Bank wire and money transfer are slower, usually quoted in business days, and frequently carry a fee and a higher minimum. Bank card deposits are widely accepted at these sites, but cards are rarely usable for payouts, so most US players deposit one way and withdraw another.

Three things delay a payout more often than the payment rail itself: incomplete KYC verification, an unmet wagering requirement still attached to a bonus balance, and a weekly or monthly payout limit that splits a large win into installments. If you email us about a slow cashout, tell us which of those three you have ruled out. And it is worth being blunt about the underlying risk: an offshore operator has no US state regulator standing behind it, so a delayed or refused payment may have no formal appeal route at all. Crypto adds a second exposure — the dollar value of a payout can move between approval and arrival.

Telling us about a specific casino

We only write about operators we have listed, and the ranked cards above this text are the current set. If your message concerns one of them, a few notes on what we already know and where reader input helps most.

Raging Bull

Our top-rated listing at 10.0, and the one readers write in about most, largely because of the headline 410% up to $10,000 plus 50 free spins. That is a deposit match, not cash: it carries rollover requirements, game weighting and a maximum cashout cap, and the terms live on the operator's promotions page — read them before depositing, because the qualifying deposit and the time limit for clearing play are where most complaints start. The site's strength for our audience is a deep RealTime Gaming slot library and a long operating history. The limitation worth stating plainly: bonus terms at this tier of match percentage are restrictive by design, and a high advertised maximum is not a likely outcome. Email us if the terms you were shown differ from what was advertised at signup.

Magician Bet

Rated 9.8, and listed here mainly for the 101% No Wagering offer — unusual in the offshore market, where triple-digit matches almost always come with rollover attached. No-wagering does not mean no conditions: minimum deposit, eligible games and a maximum bonus amount still apply, and those terms are the operator's to set and change. Worth a look if you are a value seeker who has been burned by rollover math. The drawback is scale — the match percentage is modest next to the rest of this list, and the site is less established than the older brands here, so we treat its payout claims as advertising until readers report otherwise. Those reports are genuinely useful to us.

Slots of Vegas

Rated 9.6, with 375% plus 50 free spins on Cash Chaser. The free spins are tied to one specific slot, which is a material condition people miss: winnings from them are typically capped and subject to the same wagering terms as the match. It earns its place for slot range, including progressive jackpots, and for a cashier that handles both cards and crypto for US players. The limitation: like most RTG-family sites, payout limits are applied per week, so a large jackpot does not arrive in one transfer. If you have documentation of how a staged payout ran, that is the kind of detail we want.

The rest of the list

Uptown Aces (9.6, 600% for new players), Card Crush (9.5), Zumba Cards (9.2, 250% deposit bonus up to 250 SC), BetUS (9.2, 200% up to $4,000), Amazon Jackpots (9.0), Slots and Casino (8.8, 500% up to $2,500 across three deposits) and Bets.FM (8.6, 225% up to 1 BTC plus 225 free spins) are all listed and all carry wagering, eligibility and time conditions set by the operator. Note the difference in kind: the Zumba Cards and Amazon Jackpots offers are denominated in sweeps-style coins rather than dollars, and the Bets.FM offer is crypto-denominated, so its dollar value moves with the market. If you are comparing these, compare the terms, not the percentages.

What we cover beyond casino games

Readers sometimes email asking why a page mentions sportsbook odds. Several operators on this list run more than one product line under one account and one wallet. BetUS, for example, is known in the US market as a sportsbook brand with a casino attached, which is why minimum qualifying odds appear in its bonus terms — a sports bonus clears on settled bets above a stated price, not on slot spins. That matters practically: a bonus credited to a shared wallet may have rollover that only casino play, or only sports play, contributes to. Ask us if a specific offer's contribution rules are unclear and we'll point you to where the operator states them.

Our coverage centers on real-money online casino play — online slots and their RTP and volatility profiles, progressive jackpots, table games including blackjack, roulette and baccarat, video poker, live-dealer rooms, and the mobile casino games and casino apps these sites run in-browser. We also look at the software studios behind the lobby, RNG certification claims, and provably fair games at crypto-first sites. We don't cover poker rooms or daily fantasy.

How we assess the casinos we list

If you are writing to challenge a ranking, here is what it is built on, so the argument can be a specific one.

1. Payout terms and speed as advertised — quoted processing times, withdrawal fees, payout limits and the methods actually open to US players. Advertised, not tested; we have not deposited or withdrawn at these sites.
2. Banking breadth — whether crypto, bank card and wire are all genuinely available to US customers in USD, and what each costs.
3. Bonus honesty — whether wagering, caps, game weighting and expiry are stated plainly or buried.
4. Game range and providers — slots, tables, live dealer and jackpots, and which studios supply them.
5. Licensing and operating record — the jurisdiction named by the operator (Curaçao, Anjouan and Costa Rica are the common ones) and how long the brand has run.
6. Support and responsible gambling tooling — availability of live chat, deposit limits and self-exclusion, which offshore sites often provide in weaker form than US-regulated operators.

Editorial ratings are our own scores, not customer-review averages, and no operator sees a review before publication. Findings on this page were last checked Sep 22, 2026.

Legal standing, age and eligibility

Everything we list is licensed offshore, not in the United States. These sites accept US players, but accepting customers is not the same as being authorized to serve them: no US state gaming commission or board licenses them, and for players the situation is a legal grey area that varies by state. A handful of states regulate online casino gambling, more regulate online sports betting only, and many restrict or prohibit both. Play at an offshore site brings none of the protections a state-licensed operator must provide — no segregated player funds, no state dispute resolution, no state-audited RTP, no guaranteed payout.

You must be at least 21 to use this site and the operators it lists. Check your own state's laws before depositing, and treat anything here about legality or the tax treatment of winnings as general information only — consult a qualified attorney or tax professional about your own circumstances.

Gambling costs money and most sessions end at a loss. It is not income and it will not fix a financial problem. Set a deposit limit you can afford to lose, never stake money to win back what's gone, and if play has stopped being something you control, call or text 1-800-GAMBLER — free, confidential and available 24/7. Offshore casinos may offer weaker self-exclusion and limit tools than regulated US operators, so state and national programs are worth using alongside anything the site provides.

Other reasons to write

• Corrections — a bonus figure, a banking method or a licensing detail that has changed. Include the page and, if you have it, a link to where the operator states the current version.
• Coverage requests — an offshore casino you think deserves research, and why.
• Payout experiences — good or bad, with dates and method. We don't publish reader testimonials, but patterns inform how we rate reliability.
• Listing and partnership enquiries — from operators or affiliates. Send details; a commercial conversation never starts with a promise of placement.
• Press and data use — if you want to cite our methodology or reference our comparisons.

Readers comparing restrictions in other markets sometimes ask what the equivalent looks like elsewhere; our write-up on casinos outside the UK self-exclusion scheme covers a parallel situation under different rules.

What happens next

Your message goes to an editor, not an autoresponder. If it's a correction, we verify it against the operator's own published terms before changing anything, and we date the change. If it's a complaint about a casino, we'll tell you honestly whether we can help — often the answer is that we can log it and watch for a pattern, which is less than you wanted but more useful than a form reply. If you asked something our coverage should already answer, we'll usually answer you and then go fix the page.

Take your time deciding where to play, and read the bonus terms before the bonus percentage. We're here for the questions that come up along the way.